Home / Blog

NAB 2010 Wrap-up: Winners and Losers

As a wrap-up to NAB 2010 I’ve put together a little list of NAB 2010’s winners and losers; a bit from the perspective of the South Hall which is post production. Until next year … Winners Adobe - everywhere you went people were talking about CS5. It was partly because this is a big 64-bit update but partly because Adobe has packed the release with some jaw-dropping features that make a demo. Premiere’s Mercury Playback Engine, After Effect’s RotoBrush and Photoshop’s Content Aware Fill together made Adobe the topic of NAB among post-professionals. Avid – like Adobe, Avid got a lot of good buzz with the introduction  of good product. Even Final Cut Pro only editors were talking about Media Composer 5, it’s native support of all QuickTime formats and the new “drag and drop” timeline. Add 3rd party hardware support and the web-based editing demo and Avid had one of their best NABs in a long time. 3D – It was everywhere with baskets full of 3D glasses at what seemed like most every demo booth. There were hardware and software tools abound to support stereoscopic production and post. And it was a common question at many a vendor’s booth: “Do you do 3D?” ProRes – The announcement that the new Arri Alexa camera could deliver a native ProRes file started the ProRes win but the Avid QuickTime AMA support in Media Composer 5 continued it. Pretty much every Avid demo you saw mentioned QuickTime AMA support of Apple ProRes as a signature feature. And the AJA KiPro (while introduced at last year’s NAB) still generated it’s share of discussion partly because of that ProRes support. Canon’s DSLRs – They weren’t just at every booth, atop every tripod, steadicam or crane, or surrounded by vendor after vendor’s support gear but also in the hands of seemingly everyone shooting and covering NAB. This was the year that P2 cards and XDCAM disks were out and CF cards were in. Mac OS – Smoke on Mac, DaVinci Resolve on Mac, demos on Mac … Apple may be busy with iPads but the post-production community is still busy with Macs. While the Mac OS’s Linux underpinnings probably made it easier to port Smoke and Resolve to Mac it was the ever present Macs on the South Hall show floor that let you know Macs are clearly the platform of choice for post. I hope Apple still notices. DaVinci – The industry standard in realtime color grading hardware was once expensive to buy and expensive to support. The company had fallen on some tough times and were bought by Blackmagic Design. The marriage had been a bit silent until the bombshell was dropped that the flagship (and six figure) Resolve product would now start at $995. That was big news. Losers Apple – Sure there was still Final Cut Pro and Macintosh computers all over the show floor (and ProRes as a winner) but FCP really looked long in the tooth and badly in need of a modern update after watching those Avid and Adobe demos.  Add to this the (silly) rumor of an offsite Apple announcement on the Wednesday of the show and their silence was deafening … and easily ignored. Silly rumor is almost an understatement. The whole thing smelled more of desperation from Mac rumor sites to have something happen from Apple at this NAB. Just look over this posting and you can see the direction they took it. To add insult to injury the FCP product manager began his SuperMeet presentation with the words “I have a secret to tell.” He then went on to tell no secret at all. It was a groan-producing moment after great presentations by Adobe and Avid at the Final Cut Pro User Group SuperMeet. Canon as a whole – What if you were a company that had produced one of the most popular, paradigm shifting cameras of all time? What if everyone expected a video professional version of that camera as an encore and it never came to be? What if you introduced a couple of new professional video cameras and nobody cared? FilmLight – Speaking of nobody caring … what if you introduced a new entry-level price for your Baselight color grading system and nobody noticed? When $95,000 is that entry-level price it may be that nobody cared in the wake of the DaVinci price drop. It’s probably unfair to say that nobody cared but since they weren’t on the show floor (instead showing product at a nearby hotel) out of sight meant out of mind as I only heard about the Baselight price change until after the show. Film itself – Aside from a film scanner or two there wasn’t all that much to see of real celluloid on the 2010 NAB floor. I was talking with a Evertz engineer (Evertz are the guys who’s name is often synonymous with film and Keycode) and he said this is the first year Evertz didn’t bring a single piece of film-related gear to the NAB show. Push Blackmagic Design – Okay, the reintroduction of DaVinci with an affordable Resolve was a clear winner for Blackmagic but their other big development seemed to be support of the new USB 3.0 standard. While interest was good in the products that interest was often followed by the realization that Macs don’t natively support 3.0. At least not yet. Maybe Blackmagic knows something we don’t. AJA – last year at NAB the buzz was all about the AJA Ki Pro. You were hard pressed to even push you way into the AJA booth to get a demo. While they had a nice, big booth again this year, without any major new products to announce not many folks were talking about AJA this year. And if they were it was usually about last year’s Ki Pro.  I guess you can’t have a blowout show every year. Panasonic – While the GH1 DSLR underwhelmed, Panasonic’s new AG-AF100 was being shown under glass and includes the GH1′s Micro Four-Thirds sensor in a proper camera body. Tthe excitement of the camera was often tempered with the discovery of the lower bit rate codec. Same with the 3D ready AG-3DA1. That camera looks like the venerable (and affordable) HVX200 with two lenses but the $21,000 price was what many came away from that camera with. 3D acquisition isn’t cheap! RED – RED once again didn’t show on the NAB floor, instead opting for a user event, on Wednesday of NAB, at a neighboring hotel. There probably wasn’t as much discussion this year as last about them not being on the show floor but truthfully there probably wasn’t as much RED discussion overall since everyone was shooting Canon DSLRs and talking about the Arri Alexa camera. And there were no Scarlets to been seen. Why is RED a push and not a loser? RED was really pimping the EPIC camera, even having a working prototype at the REDuser event, and those RED users who were able to get up close were very impressed, talking a lot about the camera’s size and modular design. And those I talked to weren’t just fanboys but rather serious camera owners who are looking for the best tool for the job. When it finally ships it might just be its own revolution.

13 Comments

Categories: Blog
Tags: ,

  • http://web.me.com/andymees Andy

    Hi Scott

    Interesting and well thought out as usual, but am surprised not to see Matrox in the Winners list.

    Of course there were thousands of NAB announcements that made headlines in their own way, but Matrox’s wholly unexpected exclusive pre-announce deal with AVID for monitoring via the MXO2 Mini really grabbed headline attention for them riding on the back of the Media Composer announcements, and sent folks flocking to their booth to find out more. Their CS5 support announcements were notable too, with Mercury Playback / Matrox RT support with MAX enabled MXO2 hardware on PC’s providing a direct and better alternative to lower end NVidea graphics cards … may not have garnered as much press as the Avid announcements but it certainly didn’t go unnoticed either.
    Also showing was their new Matrox Multi PCIe I/O card, the world’s first 4 channel 3G SDI cards for the Mac … and whilst not meaning much yet for end users, they also announced ProRes support in their DSX developer products which sets the stage for direct ProRes support in future windows PC based hardware that uses Matrox OEM board-sets ie folks such as AmberFin, EditShare and Vizrt.

    Matrox is not everyone’s favourite company in the Mac-based video world, but this years incredibly strong NAB2010 showing was arguably a big win for them.

    Best
    Andy

  • http://www.aberdeeninc.com Aberdeen

    I’d like to hear your NAB2010 review on the hurdles of HD and 3D storage; such as NAS and SAN solutions found throughout NAB.

    Were you even able to find all the storage exhibitors, since they were split 50/50 north and south halls? This year there was a concentrated effort on the organizers of NAB to move several storage centric companies out of the south hall and into the north hall. Do you believe this was a benefit to the show experience?

  • Philip

    Personally, I will never buy a Matrox product again, just for spite, after the way they handled the RTMac OS X transition back in 2002. (Took a couple of years to release it, after which they promptly stopped supporting Mac, even though they’d promised a soon-coming OSX driver if you bought now)

    I don’t care if they release a product that automatically edits Oscar-winning material and brews espresso through a PCI slot add-on, I’ll never give them another dime.

  • Philip

    Good article Scott. I echo your observations on Canon and Panasonic. Aside from the Canon Learning stage which featured prominent DP’s talking about their 5D experiences, you were hard pressed to find any Canon employees talking about the DSLR line and work-arounds to make it a pro tool. One guy I talked to just told me to go talk to the other vendors. Weak, when your product is all the buzz.

    And Panasonic’s prototype to compete with the DSLR’s felt slapped together in the 2 weeks leading up to NAB, including not really being able to give definite answers on specs, since they’re subject to change as the engineers really try to build it. It looked interesting, but not interesting enough to keep me from investing in a 5D rig instead.

  • http://tk3dmaker.googlpages.com Tom

    A really BIG loser was a company with an “instant” 3D solution. I can’t remember the name of the company, but they had an enclosed screening area where they showed some of the work. My associate and I lasted about 90 seconds. It was terrible. Scenes of an auto race where the depth was occasionally correct, but often terribly worng. (Things like the race cars at approximately the correct depth, but the dotted lines across the race track were foreward of the screen – until the cars passed over them and ceateda totally confused image. 3D is not jsut haveing everything at a different depth in the scene; it REQUIRES CORRECT and APPROPRIATE depth in each scene. It was like atching colorization with the colors just randomly applied.

  • Jan Crittenden

    Hi Scott, Thanks for the mention on the Panasonic products. A small update though. The 4/3′s chip in the AF100 is not the GH1′s chip but the next generation 4/3′s. And AVCHD is way better that you might think. It can compete easily with the older MPEG2 codecs and walk away shining.

    Best,
    Jan

  • http://web.me.com/andymees Andy

    “Personally, I will never buy a Matrox product again … I don’t care if they release a product that automatically edits Oscar-winning material and brews espresso through a PCI slot add-on, I’ll never give them another dime.”

    LOL. Fair enough Philip, I guess I won’t be seeing you on the red carpet then. ;-) #MXO3RUMOR

  • Pingback: Friday FilmMaking Links | SynapticLight

  • Scott Simmons

    @Philip – Interesting reasoning on the Matrox comment. By that rationale we’d wouldn’t be able to use Avid or Adobe either for many of their products and less the stellar Mac support of days gone by. I’m just glad they are all providing good support and good Mac products these days.

    @Aberdeen – I didn’t see much storage in the south hall, mainly just the G-Tech and CalDigit booths. There might have been more there but it just wasn’t on my radar this year.

    @Jan – Thanks for the correction on the 4/3 chip. That’s a very exciting camera for sure and I think we’ve all seen good AVCHD. But why such a low bit rate for those cams? Seems a shame to have such a sensor in a camera (arguably what could be the first of its kind) and then not give it the best recording codec you can? Maybe to protect those big $$ cams? Too bad when the technology seems to be capable of making such giant leaps in both performance and cost.

  • http://www.practicali.com Steve O

    Phil

    your comments are just way off base and inaccurate. They did release a OS X driver, I used it. the reality is that apple introduced in software and native video card hardware, the same and more RT that their card did. apple killed the product. how many do you think they would of sold going forwards once apple did that ?

    the current hardware & drivers are very solid. the mxo2′s have been out for several years, has cross platform compatibility ( unlike some other products ) and of course the h264 MAX accelerator. they are STILL supporting the original MXO too that must be 4 or 5 years old now ? they updated drivers on that not too long ago.

    have you been watching that they have had new driver drops every month or so for almost 2 years ? adding new features ? features like closed captioning support in FCP, CS4 compatibility and CS5 shortly on both platforms ? AME support ? the new Vetura playback app to send QT clips out ? they are very committed to the product, making it better over time.

  • Philip

    @Scott – There are many companies that have less than stellar customer support. My particular beef with Matrox had to do with broken promises, exceptionally poor communication, and abandoning Mac support completely as soon as they finished the long-promised driver, well after many other companies had managed to make their product lines compatible with the new OS. AJA and Blackmagic both have products that do the job for me, therefore I’ll give them my money instead of Matrox. Irrational? Perhaps, but it was an exceptionally galling experience with few other options when it happened.

    @Steve My comments are not inaccurate. I also used the OS X driver. I never said they didn’t release it, they just took forever and a day to do it, and basically dumped it in our laps and said, “There, I hope you’re happy now! By the way, there won’t be any further updates to this product.” Granted, Apple made the RT aspects of the card obsolete, but the i/o part of the hardware was still valuable at the time, and if they’d released the drivers sooner, it would’ve added to the useful life of the product by at least a year. This was before the AJA i/o line enabled firewire connection to capture analog sources.

    They of course came to their senses and returned to develop Mac products, but too late for me. I’ve since built many new systems, and not one of them have a Matrox product in them. I’m sure Matrox doesn’t miss me, and the feeling is mutual.

    *steps down off soapbox and grabs a beer*

  • Mike

    WIN- the cool little GoPro HD camera being sold off the florr for $199.

  • Pingback: NAB 2010 Wrap-up: Winners and losers