Home / Blog

PBS to Break into Programming with Promos

PBS logo
Are commercial-free channels an endangered species? According to The New York Times, the famously commercial-free PBS plans to start inserting spots touting show sponsors into its popular science shows Nature and Nova. The new approach, which was first floated publicly at the network’s recent annual meeting, could be extended to more PBS programming during the year. The Times reported that one impetus for the change would be to allow PBS shows to use a “hot switch” between shows. If the sponsor messages that currently appear at the end of PBS programs are instead interspersed throughout the show’s running time, the ending of one program can butt right up against the beginning of another, denying viewers an easy opportunity to switch to another channel. When PBS unleashes a barrage of promo messages at the end of a given show, “it’s almost as if someone pulled the fire alarm and [viewers] scrambled for the exits,” programming exec John Wilson said at the meeting. Many other channels have embraced the “hot switch” as a way to keep viewers engaged with new content as soon as the program they’re already watching has ended. If the end result really is a bigger audience for PBS shows, the network could be better off in the long run.
Tom Baker as the Doctor
But it will be interesting to see how longtime viewers react to a more fragmented approach to programming on PBS. In the end, promo breaks may feel natural in some types of nonfiction programming, but during other presentations — like a Ken Burns documentary, for example, or an atmospheric episode of Masterpiece — they could feel jarring. The move will also affect how producers put their shows together. It’s certainly better to plan for commercial breaks rather than to allow them to be inserted arbitrarily. For example, BBC America’s re-broadcasts of Doctor Who episodes that are shown commercial-free on BBC One have especially jarring commercial insertions that seriously wreck the mood and make the show difficult to watch. (The original Doctor Who series built its American audience in the 1970s and 1980s on PBS stations — which broadcast them, naturally, without commercial interruption.) At The Atlantic Wire, blogger Adam Clark Estes notes that the news comes at a time when PBS is already in some financial trouble. Its network is consolidating, with some stations dropping out and replacing their PBS shows with less-expensive religious programming. Executives aren’t characterizing the new plan as a way to increase revenue by offering underwriters more prominent placement, but that has to be on their minds.
TCM logo
Whatever happens to PBS programming in the future, it’s the end of an era for commercial-free TV, which is now the exclusive province of premium cable channels like HBO and Showtime as well as a few movie-oriented basic cable channels such as HDNET Movies and Turner Classic Movies. (IFC, for instance, started running standard commercials late last year.) For the sake of movie buffs everywhere, let’s hope these stalwart few don’t get any ideas!

8 Comments

Categories: Blog
Tags: ,

  • http://www.applevideoproductions1.com Frank Henderson

    I understand the desire to try to retain the audience, but aside from premiun pay channels, PBS is a welcome respite from the constant barage of commercials…which is why I rarely watch a movie on commercial TV….I recall when AMC went to commercials, and I quit watching that channel for that reason. Saturday evenings and part of Sunday evenings are always devoted to PBS, and I am grateful for keeping promos out of the program content….personally, if I am interested in a program to follow, I will stay with them because it is of interest to me, not because of some gimick to keep me tuned. I would really hate to see PBS go that route.

  • david

    …but have they considered what effect this will have on the 2X yearly local fundraising efforts?

    I, for one, will be less likely to donate directly to the local stations.

  • Bill Merchant

    Are they crazy? For $8 a month I can stream Netflix commercial free. I can watch uninterrupted content, when I want it, not with commercials on their schedule.

  • Elliott Mitchell

    Well, if they move some of the interstitial material to inside the programs, I hope they show a little more grace, style and dignity than BBC America did when it first started by making bumpers to surround the in-program announcements. Anybody remember how BBCAM handled “One Foot in the Grave?” Does anybody else with they could forget that?

    Elliott
    Nashville

  • Timbalionguy

    This is plain wrong. This will surely kill PBS, bu removing one of the key things that differentiates it from other TV programming. You can call them underwriting, but they are functionally the same thing as commercial breaks. With PBS struggling to keep its head above water, this kind of nonsense is the last thing they need to do.

    I certainly will not give to them anymore if they start doing this.

    Good bye PBS.

  • Ted Langdell

    One thing that seems to have been overlooked here is the FCC regulations that apply to underwriting announcements.

    I take note that the rules as noted here:
    http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/octqtr/pdf/47cfr73.621.pdf
    say that: “acknowledgements of contributions can be made. The scheduling of any announcements and acknowledgements may not interrupt regular programming.”

    If I recall correctly, there were (still are?) specific limits on the amount of time that could be devoted to underwriting announcements, and where they could be placed within specific lengths of programming.

    The “traditional” positions have been at the ends of programs, usually approaching the half-hour or hour marks… what commercial stations would call “terminal breaks.”

    Many Public Radio, other noncommercial stations and programs airing on Public stations have begun placing underwriting announcements—often quite a few—in between music selections or “program segments” making them sound like commercial stations.

    Personally, I don’t like the trend… and whether it’s “Masterpiece Theater” or “Wait, Wait, Don’t Tell Me,” I don’t want public station programming interrupted every 7.5 minutes for a break.

  • Eric

    “acknowledgements of contributions can be made. The scheduling of any announcements and acknowledgements may not interrupt regular programming.”

    The way this has been taken in recent years is no longer that you can’t jump in, it’s more that you can’t replace it. Basically you can’t show half a doctor who episode then do 15 mins of commercial and tell people tune in tomorrow night for the rest of the episode.

  • http://www.civiccentertv.com Chris Milia

    tv viewing is no longer enjoyable as you are no longer watching shows just the short breaks between the commericais.