Home / Blog

The Motley Fool Looks at Our NLEs

Here we are just after Apple’s biggest update yet to Final Cut Pro X. Multicam, broadcast monitoring and better third-party support are all things FCPX needs in order to gain back some of the marketshare it has lost in the professional community. Since we don’t know any actual real numbers as far as marketshare won or lost, then I’ll say these features are important for mind-share, if nothing else. They were inevitable and Apple has kept its promise to deliver them. What The Motley Fool has done is take a look at Apple’s release of Final Cut Pro X from a more business-oriented standpoint in a three-part series called Last Call for Final Cut? Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3. A lot of the information and opinion presented in the series of articles is a rehashing of what we already knew: FCPX is different, it caught a lot of traditional FCP users off-guard and made them angry, Apple’s handling of the release of FCPX and death of FCP7 was a bit ham-fisted. But what the Fool does do is dig more into the financial situation at FCP’s competitor Avid. The writer spends time talking with Avid’s senior vice president of worldwide marketing, as well as with Adobe’s director of video product management. From a purely financial standpoint, it’s hard to argue with an Apple stock price at some $450, while Avid and Adobe hover around $10 and $30, respectively. A lot of Media Composer and Premiere Pro naysayers always point to the stock prices during their argument of FCPX’s superiority, but we all know Apple’s share price has a lot less to do with FCPX than it does with iPhones and iPads. That said, Apple looks to a simplified future for its products and that’s what the FCP7 to FCPX move did for its nonlinear editor: made it simpler and pushed it beyond the traditional NLE product we have all been using for quite a while.

5 Comments

Categories: Blog
Tags: ,

  • John B

    Apple has demonstrated disdain for most of the professionals that once used FCP. Another case of a big company thinking they are too big to fail, not that the loss of FCP editors will break them financially, but i think anyone who goes back to staking their livelihoods using Apple products is taking a big risk. what will they do the next time Apple deems them unworthy of consideration in the next change.

    Me? I’ll stick to a suite of products that integrate seamlessly and are always just getting better. keep up the good work Adobe.

  • Richard Head

    Final Cut is dead and has been for some time. I can’t believe how so many folks waited so long for a new release to FCP7, coming up with insane and complicated workarounds just to stay on that platform. After waiting around for a couple of years myself, I jumped ship and never looked back. I find both Avid and Premiere to be supremely better than FCP. That being said, if either of these companies stopped offering timely updates to their software, I’d jump ship to something else. Apple has left the pro field, favoring more of a mass market appeal. FCPX will be great for the Youtube generation, and puts basic editing capabilities in the hands of many for a very reasonable price. But it can’t do what I need it to do. Sure there are workarounds, sure there are third-party plugins coming, but why bother which I can do what I need to do more easily and efficiently with another NLE RIGHT NOW! Folks are just set in their ways I guess. In a field where technological change is rapid, we still have folks clinging on to their tired, worn out editing system and work flows.

  • Eric

    I’m tempted to add “make it simpler for simple minds” but that would be unfair to those who still find an effective and creative use for such a limited app like FCPX.

    However, it’s worth noting that if Neil Young had Steve Job’s ear (pun intended) on improving a successor to iPod with high-resolution audio, then its probably safe to say Steve (rest his soul) probably would have seen the light and found a high end alternative to FCPX (or, at least given us FCP8).

    All said, it is likely (as Scott points out) that the bottom line for Apple isn’t so much FCP but iPads and iPhones.

    The future may be cheap but that doesn’t mean its better (or that we have to like it).

  • http://www.cdiabu.com Howard Phillips

    It turns out that lemmings, in fact are not lemmings. Not in the sense Disney and “we” use the term. Yet FCP and FCPX users I’m quite certain, will go dashing back to that cliff’s edge once again.

  • http://www.storyfarm.com Dean Mermell

    I’m an editor, but I used to be a sculptor. I relate to cutting very much the same way I do to making art, as a process of craft with known tools. I’m not ashamed to say I find “classic” FCP a wonderfully clear, uncluttered, well thought out set of tools, at least for the kind of work I do. If a third party were to pick it up, rewrite it as 64 bit, and address some other known shortcomings with a promise of continued development, I’d pay 2K for that software. I wish Mr. Ubilos would do a little moonlighting…