Summary: If you’re interested in an
affordable camcorder that can be used for nearly every type of
professional production, the HVX200 just may be the perfect choice.
Target APPS:
Lower-budget feature and indie films, TV productions, news, b-roll,
stock footage, reality TV, music videos, commercials, business videos
and second camera for higher-end productions
What It Costs You:
$5,995; one 4 GB P2 card, $650; one 8 GB P2 card, $1,400
What’s Cool:
Multiple SD and HD formats and resolutions; multiple frame rates
(overcrank/undercrank); true progressive recording in 480, 720 and 1080
resolutions; 1080i availability; P2 card utility and workflow; 4:2:2
color space; 16:9 native aspect imager; trigger and zoom control on
upper handle grip; camera size and mobility.
What’s Missing:
Lower cost P2 cards, higher GB P2 storage capacity, wider support by
nonlinear editing systems, no available wide converter lenses
(Century.75 will be available later this month).
RATINGS: Products are rated for features, performance, ease of
use and overall value on a scale from LAME, OK, SOLID, SWEET to HOT,
Smart Advice
Use the camera’s Focus Assist function to ensure crisp images.
The era of having to buy or rent separate cameras for each type of
production seems to be coming to an end. The Panasonic AG-HVX200 acts
as the poster child for media convergence by placing the affordable
ENG-style and cine-style production paradigm into hyper drive and into
your hands.
Keeping in mind that my office is located on the beautiful and diverse
central coast of California, I was able to put the HVX200 to the test
by taking it straight out of the box and into a myriad of challenging
environments. I shot along the windy seashore, in the dusty
oak-encrusted mountains, in downtown San Luis Obispo, indoor ENG-style
interviews and along the Big Sur cliffs and tide pools. I also tried it
out at wine festivals, classic car meets and at other similar events.
The vast majority of my testing had the camera in "run and gun" mode,
with no aftermarket accessories for the camera. I shot every format and
frame rate available on the HVX from 480/60i and 1080/60i for reality
look news-style footage to 480p (24, PA, 30), 720p (from 12-60fps) and
1080p (24, 30). I didn’t have any cine-style accessories, but it was
obvious that the HVX would be adept at cine-style production. Add on a
wide-angle converter lens (see page 12 for more on what Century will
release at NAB), matte box, follow focus, filters and lens attachments
to achieve shallow depth of field, and "voila," you’ve achieved
affordable cine-style production for smaller budget features, indie
"films," commercials, music videos, business videos and dramatic
television— in HD or SD.
Cool Features
As I used the camera, I started to notice certain features that really
stood out. For instance, the size and weight of the HVX200 helped
enable mobile production. I also found it well-balanced for high and
low handheld applications. The record button and three-speed zoom
rocker switch on the top handle make a lot of sense.
Since focus is so critical in high definition, I really appreciated the
focus-assist function. It worked well, and I’ll discuss that a bit more
later on in the review.
For professional-level production, manual controls are a necessity. The
HVX has manual control options for basically every function. The HVX’s
1/3-inch CCDs did quite well in low-light situations. The 13x Leica
zoom lens performed quite well in the field, manually and via servo.
While shooting with the camera, I used P2 cards for DVCPRO-HD and
DVCPRO-50 recording, and used Panasonic DVM63MQ MiniDV tapes for
recording DV footage. I couldn’t help but notice that the P2 cards
filled up fast! Using P2, the HVX is quiet and you end up hot swapping
the cards when they’re full— something film shooters will already be
used to. I used a small battery-powered FireWire enclosure to dump off
footage from the P2 cards. In the HVX menu, you simply program the
camera for P2 Host mode, format the drive and dump the footage. It’s
really pretty easy. For high-definition long-form productions, I’d want
larger capacity P2 cards, and a CinePorter CP-2 HDD for real mobile
production. Or a FireStore FS-100 HDD for more stationary productions
would also do.
(Note: P2 cards have already began to decrease in price and they’re
also forecast to rapidly increase in storage capacity. Go to
www.studiodaily.com for NAB pricing updates.)
How the Footage Looked
In just one word: stunning. I viewed it on the impressive Panasonic
BT-LH1700W 17-inch HD/SD LCD monitor (read our review online at
studiomonthly.com/6140.html). For comparison, I
also viewed the footage on a 1080i/720p/480i capable consumer HDTV.
High-definition footage was viewed via the HVX200’s analog component
output. Standard-definition footage was viewed by using the S-Video
connector. I found the DVCPRO HD footage in both 720/24p and 1080/24p
to be pleasingly filmic. My over-cranked (surfing) and under-cranked
(highway traffic) footage in 720p yielded smooth slow motion and
effective fast sequences. For shallow depth of field, I used the ND
filters, and set up as far from the subject as possible. A 1.6x
tele-converter or Mini 35-like attachment would have helped achieve
shallow DOF. The HVX200’s ability to adjust gain, gamma, detail and
profiles are a major plus for the camera. I was able to tweak the
HVX200 to satisfy the "look" requirements of any kind of ENG-style or
cine-style project.
The Verdict
If you’re interested in an affordable camcorder for nearly every genre
of professional production, the HVX200 just may be the perfect choice!
I’m very picky, but I had a real hard time finding fault. Once
accessory HDD units ship, and higher capacity P2 cards are available
and affordable, the HVX will be an excellent choice for almost any type
of production— ENG- or cine-style.
Close-Up
Menu Controls: The Menu reside under the top handle.
For low-level hand-held shooting, I loved having the record and 3-speed
zoom rocker on the top handle. A wide collection of connection
receptacles clusters around the Mini DV tape drive.
Lens Control: The Leica 13x lens performed quite
well. It’s large in size— 82mm. The action, whether manual or servo,
seemed quit smooth. The controls for focus assist, filters, iris and
white balance are conveniently located close to the lens barrel.
Control Buttons: Necessary professional control
buttons are located behind and below the LCD. They’re easy to use and
located in a logical pattern. The LCD mount seemed a bit loose, but
then again, a rigidly mounted LCD is easier to break away from a
camera. Outdoors I used an LCD hood, with good results.
P2 Cards: There are two P2 card slots below the
viewfinder. I found the cards easy to insert, remove and use. They
seemed to be solid and durable. P2 was easy to use via the HVX200’s
menu system. But watch out— the 4 GB cards fill up fast! Lower cost,
higher capacity P2 cards, reportedly available soon, will seriously
improve the utility of the HVX200.
Mode Controls: Below the P2 slots you’ll find easy
to use rotary dials for scene files, audio levels, a viewfinder detail
button, a P2/tape selector switch and a simple button to switch between
camera mode, VCR mode and dubbing mode.
Specs
Weight: Approx. 5.291 lbs. (excluding battery and
accessories) Dimensions: 6-11/16 inches x 7-1/8 inches x 15-3/8
inches Formats: DVCPRO HD, DVCPRO 50, DVCPRO, DV
selectable HD Recording Formats: 1080/60i, 1080/24p, 1080/24pA,
1080/30p, 720p (variable frame rates) SD Recording Formats: 480/60i, 480/24p, 480pA,
480/30p CineSwitch technology for variable frame rates in 720p
mode: 12, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 30, 32, 36, 48, 60fps
1/3-inch 16:9 native high-sensitivity progressive 3-CCD with 1080/60p
scanning
16:9/4:3 switchable for standard definition recording, 16:9 native for
HD Lens: Wide angle Leica Dicomar HD lens with optical
image stabilizer (motorized/manual mode switchable)
Thumbnail display for easy searching and file information
Auto/manual focus with focus assist (even during recording)
Steve Gibby, President of Cut4 Media Group (www.cut4.tv), is
an Emmy-winning producer/director/DP, and a national and multi-region
Emmy Awards judge. His stock footage is available via Mammoth HD.
Steve Gibby put the HVX200 through its paces
in all kinds of shooting conditions and all available frame rates. In
every instance, he says, "the footage looked
stunning."
All photos copyright 2006 Cut4 Media Group
Comments (11) for "Panasonic AG-HVX200"
1.
We have 3 at our shop for experiment. The controls are too small and hard to get to on the move. In a well set up environment they work fine but for shoot and go I prefer a 2/3" 3-CCD camera. But some see it an affordable HD camera. Why buy a Panasonic AG-HPX500 2/3" 3-CCD 16:9 P2 HD for $27,575 when you can buy FIVE Panasonic AG-HVX200 for the same price.
Posted by Ed Jones on Friday, April 6, 2007 @ 06:58 AM
2.
with a panasonic ag-hvx200 can you only film hd with the p2 card? or can you film hd on mini dv tapes?
Posted by josh on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 @ 10:06 PM
3.
In the "What's Missing" section, what do you mean by "wider support by nonlinear editing systems?"
Posted by Chris on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 @ 01:28 PM
4.
I love this camera,the color is beautiful..Its just really bad in low light!any suggestions on a on camera light
Posted by T.Thompson on Wednesday, December 12, 2007 @ 07:34 PM
5.
"Why buy a Panasonic AG-HPX500 2/3" 3-CCD 16:9 P2 HD for $27,575 when you can buy FIVE Panasonic AG-HVX200 for the same price."
Idiot. Why buy one 1 Mercedes, when I can buy 5 Hugos. Quality, quality,quality
Posted by James Mason on Monday, December 17, 2007 @ 01:38 AM
6.
The author didn't go into the focus assist function later in the review as mentioned. What low-light testing and results are available to hear about? Another poster suggests poor low-light capability -- how bad is it?
Posted by Scott Duncan on Thursday, December 20, 2007 @ 05:31 PM
7.
just opinions:
i agree, there is a reason for the bigger chips and room for processing. from DOF issues to low light sensitivity. a simple A/B comparison is amazing, shooting in a low light room for documentary. the baby cams don't cut it. without the A/B, and with lots of light, like the daylight testing mentioned above, sure the cams look great compared to what we're used to. what really kills me, is that we consider 2 megapixes pix high def. a 2 megapix canon elph is sneered at in pocket cam world, where even my 8 megapix elph captures full screen 30p video. (actually useable for accident scene broadcast in emergency.)
as a full size steadicam operator, i have many requests to fly these baby 6 pounders. the pix from a full size older varicam HD just blow them away, especially in subtle lighting.
note: i used baby cams during the first 5 years of business, blowing away my competition stuck with big but older tech. but once you drive the mercedes, the hugo sucks to high heaven.
just opinions, no baby cam lovers need to yell at me here.
great day!
Posted by gary on Saturday, December 22, 2007 @ 09:23 AM
8.
Gary raises a very provocative point that I have not seen anywhere else. Sure, the babycams blew the heavy legacy cams out of the water a few years ago. Gary was lucky. That was a good time to get started, technology-wise. Now the full-sized legacy cameras are HD and the babycams don't compare well, so in essence, the barriers to entry have gone up again. If you aren't well-capitalized, you'll have to go to work for someone else and wait for the next big thing.
Posted by Steve on Saturday, December 22, 2007 @ 03:09 PM
9.
I shot with both the HVX200 and DVX100 last night. I found the HVX200 in SD mode to be much more difficult in regards to low light and maintaining manual focus, whereas the DVX100 was superb in the same conditions. Is it a HD versus SD difference for this camera? Anyone else experience this?
Posted by Dane on Sunday, December 23, 2007 @ 09:05 PM
10.
Yeah Dane, I've kinda been amazed at how well the 100 holds its own in low light, but boosting the mid and hi gain as well as the pedestal in the 200 made a world of difference too. Incidentaly, I don't even know if these features work in SD - (shooting in HD with this cam is like adding a computer to your production, while shooting on tape is like having someone take it away). But then I leave the location/set knowing that I can crank it a little more in Avid if need be and it ends up looking great despite whatever dissasters I faced in the field. So I think I'm fully sold on the 200, though I will be purchasing a 500 as well in early '08.
Posted by Tony Wilson on Tuesday, December 25, 2007 @ 02:00 AM
11.
Why doesn't anyone mention the Firestore drive? It is cheaper than a P2 card.
Posted by Merrill on Thursday, August 21, 2008 @ 07:12 PM