Apple called them "our guinea pigs". A Sony representative commented that this type of workflow had never been attempted before on one of their films. For Alex Kendrick of Sherwood Pictures, the making of the upcoming Sony/Provident Pictures movie, Fireproof, was a technical adventure.
Set to be released on September 26th, Fireproof follows firefighter Captain Caleb Holt as he prepares to walk away from a rapidly disintegrating marriage. But before he can go through with the divorce, he receives a challenge to give the marriage 40 more days. Reluctantly agreeing, Captain Holt discovers that the job of rescuing people from fires is nothing compared to this assignment – rescuing love from the ashes.
Similar to Sherwood Pictures’ previous film, Facing the Giants, Fireproof was shot using the Panasonic VariCam. But unlike Giants, Kendrick didn’t rely on DVCPro HD tapes. Instead, an SDI feed was captured from the Varicam directly to an on-set Mac using Final Cut Pro and Blackmagic’s DecklinkHD. The video stream was encoded using Apple’s ProRes 422 at a 220 Mbps data rate. “This data rate was much higher than if we had gone with DVCPro HD. We used the tapes as a backup, but 98% of the time the capture was a flawless process,” says Kendrick.
The decision to capture the footage directly to hard drives was motivated in part by his experiences editing Facing the Giants: “On our last film, we only used DVCPro HD. And although the image was great, there were times we had to zoom in or crop the sides, and we began to see artifacting as the image was enlarged.” Alex knew they needed to go another route with this project.
Plans began to be made to capture the footage straight to the computer. Apple’s ProRes 422 was the new kid on the compression block at that time, and its combination of lower data rate and higher quality made a winning team. On the hardware side, AJA’a IO Box was the top choice, as it enabled HD capture and editing with a laptop. It kept the setup smaller and simpler. But when they couldn’t get their hands on an IO unit, plans had to change. Instead, the entire editing workstation had to be brought on set, with a Decklink HD card as the capture device. Bob Scott, the film’s DP, commented, “It was a little bit bigger than what I originally envisioned, but it worked fine.”
Once system specs were in place, Kendrick still wondered how stable the capture process would be during filming. But surprisingly, workflow problems arose from another source. They planned on using the Panasonic HVX-200 as a B camera to get shots in situations where the Varicam just wouldn’t work, such as by the fast-moving wheels of a freight train. But the process of importing the P2 footage was not straightforward. “It took us longer to figure out the workflow with the P2 cards than it did with the VariCam and Blackmagic card. On the front side I began to get real scared that we weren’t going to be able to get to the P2 footage because our technicians were having trouble dumping it out,” Kendrick admits.
Once principal photography got underway, the benefits of Fireproof’s all-digital workflow became evident. As soon as a scene was shot, Kendrick could walk over to the capture station and immediately play it back. This instant feedback was invaluable in making sure he’d gotten what was needed. “There were several occasions where I would watch the footage and then say, ‘We need to do this differently or frame this differently,’ and we would be able to go back and do the scene again right away,” says Kendrick.
He also appreciated the ability to begin editing during downtimes on set. “I’d rather shoot digital than film because of the ease of the workflow. Whenever we’d have a break on set, I would go piece a scene together. Two hours later when we were getting ready to set-up another scene, I could show the crew an edit.” When shooting wrapped in December, most of the film’s scenes were rough cut.
This immediate access to the day’s footage didn’t come without a price. The Varicam had to be tethered to the desktop at all times, no matter what was being shot.
This proved problematic, especially during crane or dolly shots. In one scene with a car wreck, the crew found it especially tricky to maneuver the cables without compromising the tether. “But,” says Kendrick, “that forced us to be creative, and we came up with a solution.” Creativity notwithstanding, the SDI feed was still lost on several occasions, such as when DP Bob Scott was holding the camera on his shoulder as he ran through a burning building. Alex took it in stride. “Safety’s gotta come first. In those instances we just had to rely on what was captured in camera. And those shots are cut so quickly anyway, the average viewer won’t even notice the quality difference.”
The SDI umbilical cord meant that not only did the camera have to stay close to the computer but the computer had to stay close to the camera. Bob Scott says it was a logistical challenge. “Our video village wasn’t just a viewing monitor. It was a whole control room setup. We had to have a complete mobile editing system attached to the camera. The computer’s recording everything we’re doing, so that department was one of the most vital of all.” Because the computer was moved around so frequently, the workstation’s various components were stored in hard cases and carted around in an SUV to the different shooting locations.
The video village crew soon had the setup process down to a fine art. Kendrick says, “We would arrive ahead of the rest of the crew to begin setting up the workstation. I think the fastest we ever did it was forty minutes, but normally we gave ourselves an hour. And that’s everything. The camera, tripod, power lines, battery packs, tether to the computer, workstation, monitors, software – everything was up and running.”
Once shooting wrapped, it was time for serious editing. “Because we were planning to finish on film, I needed to edit in a true 24fps timeline. When Final Cut Pro captures out of the VariCam, it captures all 60 frames but only tags 24 of them. Before I could really edit, I had to convert the footage into true 24fps. Converting the footage took some time to do, so we just dedicated a couple of days to that task The benefit of going this route was once everything was converted, it only used a third of the original storage space. The final cut of our movie took up 65 GB, even though we shot probably 2 TB of footage.”
Would he go all digital again, annoying tether and all? Kendrick says an unequivocal yes: “I plan on shooting my next feature this way. I was so pleased with the quality of the image. And even though we shot at 720p, the footage could stand head to head with 1080 footage because it was captured at such a high data rate. Sony blew it up to 1080, and when they compared it to other projects shot on 1080, they couldn’t see much of a difference. Because of the data rate, it was a really impressive image.”
Comments (12) for "Taking Editing to a Whole New Level on the Set of Fireproof"
1.
Fascinating article! I'm really looking forward to seeing Fireproof!
Posted by Natalie Wickham on Friday, September 26, 2008 @ 05:53 PM
2.
What a great article, thank you very much!
Posted by Anastasia Zagoruiko on Saturday, September 27, 2008 @ 03:32 AM
3.
Very cool, It is amazing how far the Kendrick have come in such a short time!
Posted by Dallas on Monday, September 29, 2008 @ 04:11 PM
4.
I read that "Dante's Inferno" shot with this same work flow in 2005 (Varicam to Decklink). Must have been a different codec since the Apple ProRes wasn't out yet. I just got it on DVD. It looks great (no artifacts, good dynamics, etc.).
Posted by Jerry on Monday, September 29, 2008 @ 05:04 PM
5.
Sounds like a tough way to shoot if you like improvising your blocking and making changes on the fly. For predictable days though, its worth the big jump in quality. That DVCPro HD footage is pretty heavily compressed.
Posted by Eric Levy on Monday, September 29, 2008 @ 05:07 PM
6.
Saw "Fireproof" yesterday and must admit it was a much improved look over "Facing the Giants". Having read the article I'm amazed at how clean it looked being shot at 720p then bumped up to 1080. The Kendricks made a great choice. Look forward to the next one
Posted by Doug Siemens on Monday, September 29, 2008 @ 05:32 PM
7.
How did you deal with timecode!? I just did 4 days of green screen footage tethered to a Sony F900 but the HD-SDI didn't pass timecode. A BlackMagic rep. said the card doesn't do TC over the SDI?
Posted by AnthonyD on Monday, September 29, 2008 @ 06:33 PM
8.
We are looking at the future day by day and these posts are saving us lots of pain, time, money and productivity. Thank you.
Posted by Mark on Monday, September 29, 2008 @ 07:23 PM
9.
I saw Fireproof last weekend. I was not impressed with the image. It still looks like video trying to look like film. More lens filtration, use of primes and a shorter depth of field was needed throughout. I shoot video with the CineAlta 900, XDCAM 335 and the Panasonic 200. I also shoot with the Aaton 16-XTR and Arri 35-BL4. None of these video cameras provides the quality of image compared to 16mm or 35mm film. I would suggest that Mr. Kendrick use Super 16 or 35mm next time. The new Kodak stocks are awesome and provide a latitude of stops and image quality that HD can only fantasize about. Mr. Kendrick have greater flexibility of camera movement, use less lighting instruments and more natural light, and the overall image will be superior in every way. The story will also look less like a "Made-for-TV Production" and more like a feature film. Sherwood Pictures does an awesome job of getting the most for their money BUT I'd wish they'd spend a few more dollars and shoot on film. That combined with more action-oriented camera angles (possible without teather) would dramatically increase the power of their stories.
Posted by Todd Hewey on Tuesday, September 30, 2008 @ 05:26 PM
10.
THE FUTURE OF "FILM" IS HERE.
Shooting this way is more cost efficient than shooting on actual film. The entire budget for "Fireproof" was around a quarter of a million dollars. Shooting on film would have been a lot more expensive.
Most people in an audience are going to be oblivious to the look of film vs video anyway, since they watch more video than film.
Film, as we know it, is dying. The future of film is video.
Posted by Thomas on Saturday, October 11, 2008 @ 03:11 PM
11.
I'm sorry, but their p2 DIT s need to be fired. WTH do you mean they couldn't figure out P2 offloading/import?!
That's ridiculous. P2 workflow couldn't be easier. If I can teach an intern how to do it in under an hour, why can't some 1st AC/DIT figure it out. That smells a little fishy to me.
Posted by Matt G on Thursday, October 23, 2008 @ 06:16 AM
12.
Yeah, the thing about P2 had me chuckling too.
Posted by Andrea D'Elena on Saturday, January 17, 2009 @ 09:27 PM