The True Story of Making a ‘Go-for-Broke' Short
Film & Video asked Totten and coproducer Leda Maliga to document their production. The team encountered escalating budgets, miniDV/high-def debates, downconversion issues, and crew walk-outs. What they’ve written is invaluable (and often humorous) info that will benefit other indie filmmakers interested in new ways of working. The writers’ candidness in relating the confusion they felt when confronted with new technologies is something most filmmakers will recognize.
What follows is the diary of Michael and Leda
and one-acts, when I met Josh Marchette. There we were, smoking
cigarettes outside the Bliss House Cafà© on Vermont, when Josh tells me
he wants to make a short film.
Alpha 60, a filmmaking club she helped start. Alpha 60 is structured so
that you have four weeks to make a five-minute movie. Josh showed me
his script and we decided I’d produce the movie Alpha 60 -style. I told
him I could get two Canon XL1s for free and he’d just have to come up
with $20 for tape stock. It would be easy. We’d shoot it in a weekend.
No big deal.
using the XL1s, so I got on the horn with ZGC, the U.S. rep for P+S
Technik. They said the converter [an optical lens converter that allows
DPs to mount prime lenses made for film on DV cameras] could make our
MiniDV footage look like High Def or Super 16 if we lit it right. They
said Danny Boyle had shot 28 Days Later using the converter. I went to
Birns & Sawyer to check it out. Seeing an XL1 with a huge piece of
glass on the end of it made me take the whole thing more seriously. I
called Josh and told him if we could come up with $250, we could get
this converter and it would make our short stand out from all the other
miniDV movies out there. He was sold and we agreed to split the cost.
from an insurance settlement. We decided we would use two XL1s and two
P+S Technik converters, we’d get a sound guy and make the best short
ever made. I was psyched.
Esmaeel, who owned a Panasonic VariCam and had just finished shooting a
feature with James Woods. I knew we couldn’t afford her, but I ended up
getting her on the phone and saying we had $3000 for the whole movie.
She said she liked the sound of the project and wasn’t too busy at the
time. Then she said she could provide everything we needed, including
the camera package, lights and grip equipment for a two-day shoot for
$3000. The sound guy would be $400. The only other cost would be food.
might be able to shoot the thing high-def. I explained Deanna’s package
deal and that I was willing to take out some money. Josh still didn’t
have the settlement money, so things were on hold. I continued to
research the high-def option and the differences between the Sony and
Panasonic cameras. I was convinced that the VariCam looked more like
film. We were so excited to make a high-def movie.
writing what was really a journal entry. Then I saw an episode of CBS’s
48 Hours that fascinated me, about a woman who had been convicted of
killing her family. I combined my journal entries with this story, and
it became the first draft of our film. I was at a coffeehouse one day
when I met Michael. We discussed filmmaking, and I told him I was an
actor who had written this short film. I said I needed a producer, as I
had no idea how to get it going. Getting something off the ground-
that’s the hard part. Michael read it, wanted to produce it and thus
began our journey.
confidence in those around me. Jay Lacopo was incredibly helpful, and
Leda pushed me to continue to improve the script. At one point I felt
lost, and I became insecure about the story. I also began to stress
about money.
raised enough money to get started, and then I began questioning what
to shoot on. I’ve never liked the way DV looks. I wanted to shoot on
film, but it didn’t seem possible. Michael researched HD, but I wasn’t
happy with it. It was fake, glossy, not the "film look" I like so much.
I struggled with this decision. I must have driven them crazy until I
finally decided to go HD. Michael found out about the P+S Technik,
which made HD look like film. I couldn’t be happier with the way the
film looks, and am so pleased that we might have done something that no
one else has.
them. But I didn’t know how many. I had a hard time finding my voice as
a director the first day. I didn’t know much about light so I kept
quiet, to my own detriment. After the first day I knew I had to adjust.
I don’t think I realized just how much pressure I was under. If it
didn’t come out well, it was going to be my fault.
HD. I’ve been shopping a screenplay of mine along with "Turning It
Over," showing just how good a low-budget film can look. Interest has
been substantial. I credit Peter Gray and his amazing knowledge of
lighting HD.
including me, talk a big game about what they are going to do, and what
they can do, all the while saying how bad everyone else is. Truth is,
they (like me) never get it done. That’s different now. We got it done.
Who knows what’ll come of this, but two guys outside of a coffee shop
who talked about making a movie ended up making one. Sometimes, you
never know what will happen if you just show up.
and wants to set the date for June 5th. I told Leda about it and gave
her a copy of the script.
full-time, so didn’t have too much time to give, but met Josh for
coffee to tell him I could work on the script and help him prepare for
his directing debut.
She needed a $1000 deposit and full insurance coverage on the
equipment. I hadn’t even thought of that. The insurance was going to be
another $600. I called Josh and he freaked out. We didn’t have $1600
extra allocated in our budget. We still didn’t have the insurance money!
high-def and that we didn’t want to go back to miniDV. We started
talking locations. Josh had a friend with a house they had converted
into a makeshift studio. We could shoot the whole movie there in
exchange for helping them finish the hardwood floors.
thought should have the female lead. Josh thinks she’s perfect. After
she left, I gave Josh some major structural changes to the script. He
didn’t like them.
I found a cinema scout and the California Film Commission (CFC). We
could shoot three of our seven locations at the Fred C. Nelles
Correctional facility for an additional $600. Josh and I went out there
to take photos. The place was an operational correctional facility full
of hardcore rapists and murderers. The locations were awesome. Whitney
said yes to the project!
Insurance, Equipment INS, and CFC location contracts. All of these
things are going to cost money, which we don’t have. At all. Also, it’s
getting hard being the goalie between Josh and Leda. Josh doesn’t like
Leda’s notes and Leda doesn’t think Josh’s script makes sense. Instead
of communicating with each other, they call me- and bitch.
my time and I’m not working. I’ll see if I can scrounge up a painting
gig in Topanga from Randi Johnson, my cousin, a writer/producer that
might have pity on me.
up with a gig shooting behind the scenes footage for The Man Show. Got
paid $250 bucks to basically follow half-naked women around. Spent the
other days painting patio furniture for a friend of my mom’s out in
Topanga.
was no way we could shoot this thing in three weeks if we wanted to do
it high-def. I had to call everyone to tell them we were postponing the
shoot indefinitely. I had lined up 10 people and pumped it up so much
that they were pretty pissed I was canceling. It was embarrassing.
lenses, lighting, frame rates, and upconversions/downconversions. I
can’t believe how many of the "pros" have different opinions about how
to get things done properly. The one thing that’s consistent is cost-
it’s all expensive. I found out that Clairmont Camera is the only place
in town that has the Pro35 adapter, which is the bigger version of P+S
Technik’s "magic" adapter. I also found out that you need all types of
accessories to make it work with the camera, in addition to the set of
Super Speed prime lenses. I start to think it might be less expensive
to shoot on 35mm.
for support of the Pro35, but this is included with the Pro35. What
would be needed is an Arriflex type balancing plate that comes with the
cameras from Clairmont Camera and would be available from any rental
house that provides Arriflex accessories for their HD and SD cameras.
lenses rents for $300 per day. Five comparable focal length Zeiss HD
lenses rent for $930 per day. This is a $230 savings per day by using
the Pro35. Add more focal lengths and the savings gets greater.
the way. Within a month we’ve jumped from shooting this thing on an XL1
for a few hundred bucks to a $10,000 high-def short. We are psyched.
high-def thing. I agree with him. The whole idea to shoot HD was to get
a film look without the expense. The problem is, it doesn’t seem to be
less expensive and we haven’t as of yet seen any high-def that really
looks like film.
afternoon to check out some high-def footage transferred to 35mm. A lot
of what we saw looked like video. There were a couple of short clips
that had blown-out, desaturated looks that were closer to what we are
going for, but for the most part, we didn’t love it. Josh was
particularly disappointed and took off in a hurry, saying he wants to
shoot on 35mm.
of us go. They gave me three months’ notice, so I packed up my stuff
and went home. I’m going to start working on the movie a lot more and
going to the office a lot less.
is. If you are staying in SD, you should downconvert the 24p HD to 60i
SD (preferably on DigiBeta or Betacam SP) and then forget all about the
HD masters.
to make a film print) then you might as well dub the HD to any DV
format for your offline edit. In this case, you can use Cinema Tools to
generate a 24p EDL that you can use to conform your HD footage to your
DV edit.
with some people at two LA post facilities. The prices that I got for
exactly the same thing were thousands of dollars apart. Worse than
that, the steps to get to the "finished" point are completely different!
particular to HD can kill a project in post. I spoke to JD, one of the
Final Cut Pro teachers over at Promax, who assured me that FCP4 would
be able to handle our footage in the proper way and we’d only have to
pay for downconversions from the masters to DVCAM. I’m just hoping
Final Cut 4 shows up soon so we can test it out at my house and just
post this thing for free. We are being bombarded with horror stories
and it’s got us scared enough to make us reconsider using high-def.
handle it. If you want to edit the HD footage without downconverting at
all, you can do that too. Of course in that case you need super fast
hard drives (i.e. SCSI arrays) and a capture card that can input the HD
signal.
just like a "normal" show. Then use Cinema Tools (included in FCP 4) to
create an EDL that will allow you to conform your HD footage later.
should shoot this on miniDV using the P+S Technik converter and spend
money on a good lighting person and crew. But Michael is the visionary,
talking about cranes and helicopter shots and really pushing us to
shoot high-def.
to shoot with Deanna’s package even though she’s giving us a deal. Josh
said he’d begrudgingly shoot miniDV as it would be cheaper. Michael was
depressed. He had completely lost interest in shooting on miniDV.
like the way it looked at all. He wanted to see more examples of
high-def. He set out to drive to Deanna’s cabin in the woods. We got a
call from him at midnight. He had gotten lost and was coming back to LA
without meeting Deanna or seeing any examples of her work.
about the particular look we wanted to achieve with her camera. I got a
call from an AD who says he can do the job and will make a preliminary
schedule for us tomorrow. We met with an online editor who says he’ll
let us do our online at his facility for free!
miniDV. I don’t know if Josh is going to come up with any additional
money and I still haven’t actually seen any of the additional money
that we’ve been waiting for.
high-def or miniDV? This is totally fucking insane. We’ve been setting
decision deadlines and breaking them for the last two weeks. This is
the last thing we should be haggling about now. So many crucial things
are being held up.
we’re trying to find a dolly for cheap. The AD’s cell phone seems to
have been disconnected, so we have no schedule. We met with a potential
production designer named Inga who had worked on a high-def project and
was willing to work for free. We went to the house of a
friend-of-a-friend in Laurel Canyon, who graciously offered to let us
use his mansion overlooking LA as one of our locations.
the $500 deposit. Then we drove across town to the CFC to secure our
locations. When we got there, they needed another $1000 deposit. I
wrote a personal check. We still didn’t have the list of our crew with
all their social security numbers. We promised them we’d get it as soon
as we knew whom our crew would be.
and said we weren’t going to be able to shoot next week unless we made
a format decision. Josh decided on high-def. I left messages for the AD
all day but got no response.
the P+S Technik converter and a set of Zeiss Super Speed Primes. This
is our best and least expensive way to make video look like film
without actually shooting film.
only about $2000 bucks. Everything else is going to be the same- sound,
lights, grip, props.
best, and certainly giving us more options and looks in post. It’s
done. The decision has been made.
high-def look as much like film as possible. We’re planning a
production BBQ for Sunday and hope to get these things resolved then.
runs the Hollywood Shorts monthly screenings, introduces me to bar
owners. I have to have a drink with every bar owner on the block, so by
the time I get back to Michael who has been waiting for me in the car,
I am sloshed.
general list designed for lower-budget productions. I hadn’t seen a
script at this stage, nor had any substantial discussion about the
desired "look," or visual style of the movie. After discussion, we
ended up streamlining and/or changing many items, although this
original list was very useful as a backbone to work from. Because of
the (severe) budgetary constraints, I encouraged them to rent a small
lighting van with a fixed grip and lighting inventory that provided the
basic things we needed as closely as possible. Then I agreed to do the
best I could with whatever was available, without renting a lot of
additional items. In other words, I agreed to "compromise," or be
flexible, for the sake of the very limited budget, while still aiming
for high production value.
successfully with relatively low lighting levels, meaning you can rent
the smaller, cheaper lights, rather than the larger, much more
expensive units. I like working with very low light levels because it
is highly controllable, so I embraced this approach. There are many
small lighting trucks or vans available in Los Angeles from smaller,
independent equipment owners that are a god-send for indie production.
They are relatively cheap (sometimes as low as $500 a day as an all
inclusive deal), but you must accept their fixed inventory. Once you
start sub-renting additional items, the price quickly shoots up; so if
you can work with what they provide, then it can be extremely
economical. This is what we did in the end.
too big. People don’t respond to me the same way they do a good looking
woman (petite, too). She just seems so harmless that they don’t see her
coming.
seemed young, a bit star-struck and really wowed that Matt and Ben put
up money for this. He said he’d bring a preliminary schedule to the BBQ
tomorrow.
made a list of all the additional lighting and grip equipment he’d like
to have available on set. We had assumed that the package deal was
everything we needed.
Food For Less to get food for the BBQ. When we got to the house, the
phone wouldn’t stop ringing. The list of crew on their way included
Deanna ( co-director of photography/camera operator), Peter, Inga the
production designer, my friends Azalia Snail for wardrobe and Sara
Tucek for script supervisor, Michael Jesmer as sound designer, and
Michael Gordon as behind-the-scenes videographer.
equipment that would easily cost close to $1500 extra. Leda and I sat
there, nodding and trying to pretend everything was cool.
mixing duties. While it is by no means impossible or even uncommon on
low-budget projects to have one "sound person," the end result can
often be less than desired.
contains extraneous noises or interference, you have to know that your
mixer will let you know. Having someone, especially someone for free,
operating the boom and mixer simultaneously leads me to think that,
while noble, they will be getting in over their heads. Consider a
situation where there’s an audio problem: Would they tell the director,
or would they keep quiet so as to look like everything is going well
and that they’re doing an excellent job? It’s more cost effective and
consistent to redo a take instead of looping the audio in post where
you’re paying hundreds of dollars an hour as opposed to hundreds of
dollars a day. If your lighting suddenly dimmed, everyone on set would
notice and you’d retake the scene.
internal limiters of some DV cameras are extremely harsh. And while
their intent is to allow a "no hands" approach to audio for the
consumer, they can really kill the sound of a professional project.
Along similar lines, if you are using the DV as your audio recorder (as
opposed to DAT, DA88 or other multitrack device), make sure that your
record mode is set to 48 kHz, 16 bit (usually the 2-channel record
mode) and not the ever-dreaded 32 kHz, 12-bit which sometimes allow for
4 channels of record. This will only reduce the overall frequency
bandwidth of your material; making a scene that would normally sound
clear, sound hissy and muffled.
and grip equipment or the sound guys that Peter wants us to hire. John
McMinn, another great person working for free on the movie, hired some
other sound guy who says he can operate the mixer and boom at the same
time. We know this isn’t ideal, but we can’t afford two people in the
sound department.
money or time. Deanna would need at least a day of prep to get familiar
with it and we’d have to have it mounted at Clairmont.
Now we have to tell the guy McMinn hired that we can’t use him. And
tell Josh we need more money for sound. We’re also going to need more
money for food and for the extra grip and electric equipment. And a lot
more grips/electrics and PAs.
people who are passionate about filmmaking and will work for free. We
made some comment about how if you’re in it for the money, you’re in it
for the wrong reasons.
set at an opening of T2.8 or larger to make sure that the ground glass
grain does not cause any artifacts on large flatly lit surfaces, such
as the sky. This is not a problem as the exposure can be controlled by
the Pro35’s own iris that does not affect the depth of field and the
camera’s ND filters. Also, there is a speed control for the motor on
the lens ground glass and this needs to be adjusted when lenses are
changed to a different focal length while looking at the monitor for
any sort of a motion artifact. This only takes a moment.
Wiseman, who I like to call the High-Def Guru. He says he knows one of
the rental people down at Clairmont and he’ll put a call in. Great!
printed out a single spaced to-do list that filled two pages. We put
people’s names next to tasks and sent everyone off.
strict dress code and we need to have everyone’s social security
numbers and drivers license numbers turned in, but we are still
assembling the cast of 15 extras and the crew. We need more PAs.
just have to get Deanna and Peter over to Clairmont with the camera so
they can mount it and teach them how to use it. They’re not really sold
on the thing and say it’s going to slow them down, but we’re willing to
take the chance.
cash deposit for the converter. We sent a PA over with an envelope. We
barely know the guy but we’re trusting him with all that money.
not having a permit. At lunch we forgot to get anything vegetarian and
had no sodas until we ran out and bought some ourselves.
Whitney on the patio, was way up in the hills. We weren’t even sure the
grip truck would make it around some of the curves. We were two hours
behind schedule and things started to fall apart.
thought it was bad focus-pulling, but after 15 minutes we realized it
was a back-focus issue with the P+S Technik that we’d been warned
about. It would take 30 minutes to fix, and the sun was already where
we needed it.
Josh and I met on the backside of the house to try to figure out what
was happening. We couldn’t find the AD, and chaos was breaking out.
Just then, the key grip quit. We all just stood and stared at him. The
sound team came up next, saying they don’t work over a 12-hour day and
were leaving. The sun was dipping behind the horizon, and we had not
gotten anything we needed. We were standing on a balcony that
overlooked LA and I felt like jumping over the edge.
explained I needed an AD to come and help me. It was 9 p.m., but I was
desperate to schedule the next two days. My cell phone rang and I ran
to stand over the toilet, the only place where my phone worked. The
stranger was an experienced AD. I didn’t even get his name, I just
explained that everything was crumbling and slipping through my hands
like fine desert sand. The voice on the other end told me he had been
there before and said that it was normal. He talked me down, and I had
enough energy to get me through the next few hours.
production office (my house), where we’re scheduled to meet and drive
to the correctional facility. Michael, wild-eyed and showing sure signs
of serious sleep deprivation, has to drive the truck. There is a
specific window of time when people can enter and exit the correctional
facility, and if we miss that window we won’t get the shot. And we’re
running late.
lost the key grip yesterday. I watch him sweating and wish I could
help, but I have to help figure out how to get lunch and dinner
delivered to a high-security prison.
girlfriends, Allison Miller, volunteers to get replacement lights. It’s
going to be a two- to three-hour trip in traffic! I let her take my
car. Meanwhile, the 18-year-old hair and make-up girls are feeling
disrespected. I can’t take five minutes to listen to them bitch about
their hurt feelings.
prison, but I decide to merge two locations. As I run by the darkened
windows of the prison buildings, to check on the second location, I
hear hissing and cat calls from all directions.
miss the natural light and have to use one of the big lights Allison
delivered. Meanwhile, we are trying to plan tomorrow’s shoot. We go
around and around in circles.
contributing to us not staying on schedule. I’ve been on a lot of
shoots, and camera and lighting set-ups never take this long. It also
seems like blocking (or lack thereof) is slowing us down. We should
know exactly where to place camera lights and actors before we shoot.
It’s been embarrassing. The first night, our dolly grip walked off set
at about 13 hours in and said he couldn’t be a part of our production.
Shortly after, our sound left- thankfully just for the night- but they
did walk out promptly at 12 hours the second night as well.
camera. Here’s how: With the lens removed and the motor stopped, shine
a soft, even light into the Pro35. Adjust the back-focus ring until the
grain pattern is sharp. Attach the lens and voila, you’re ready for the
day.
cases, especially with modern cameras, you will see that no further
adjustment is necessary.
festival screener. The people who choose which films get in are
probably watching these entries on a regular-definition TV set- they’ll
never know the difference.
have his own editing system, so we’re editing on my G4. Once the
high-def deck gets here to get the downconversions done, we’re going to
have to borrow a DVCAM deck and a Firewire drive. We need a rough cut
ASAP so we can see what else we have to shoot. We put an ad up on
North Hollywood. His name is " Jon 9," and he has a blue Mohawk and
tons of expensive equipment jammed into a little room. He offers us
hot, green tea.
the right decision. Everything looked amazing! Peter and Deanna spent
lots of time desaturating the colors within the camera’s menu settings
which looked nice and the converter gives you the all the depth of
field you could ever need. Also, the oscillating ground glass inside
the device gives you a look similar to film.
need to edit in 30fps. You can pretty much forget all about the 24fps
footage. Once you’re done with your DVCAM edit you can use Cinema Tools
to generate an EDL that will reference the 24fps timecode on your HD
tapes.
exception of lots of stuff that was out of focus as a result of the
back-focus issue of the converter. This was easily avoided if we knew
about it.
camera. Here’s how: With the lens removed and the motor stopped, shine
a soft, even light into the Pro35. Adjust the back focus ring until the
grain pattern is sharp. Attach the lens and voila, you’re ready for the
day.
cases, especially with modern cameras, you will see that no further
adjustment is necessary.
pick-ups for free. We also got in touch with Barbara Lowry at ZGC. When
there was no other Pro35 available at the 11th hour, ZGC made their
demo unit available by special arrangement through Clairmont! We want
to get the rough cut done before we schedule the pick-up day, but we
still don’t have the downconversions done.
to put the timecode in the black so we could matte it out, but he put
it over the image. We can’t ask them to redo it, because we got them
for free. That sucks.
(different brands use different lubricants that can react with each
other), or using a consumer grade product. That’s why we recommend
filmmakers try Panasonic’s DV Master grade videotape. It delivers
higher output, lower head wear, reduced head clogs and improved
magnetic density over standard DV tape. Our tapes also use a synthetic,
or "dry" lubricant rather than traditional oil-based lubricant.
are very compatible 24p cameras, and many projects, such as the Fox
series Arrested Development, are successfully intercutting them. For
Arrested Development, VariCams are the main camera on set, while the
AG-DVX100 are used to offer a different look for shots like shooting
flashbacks.
the footage with. Should he edit in a 24fps timeline or a 30fps
timeline? We had been advised by "experts" to do it both ways. We made
a few calls at dinner and got a few different points of view. You
cannot downconvert from 24fps high-def to 24fps DVCam. The DVCAM is
going to record at 30fps, so it’s smarter to edit in a 30fps timeline
and then output a 24fps EDL.
beautiful. But there are about eight scenes that we didn’t get to.
Martin put big slates with the scene numbers on them as placeholders.
two hours to shoot the most important scene of two days. I had to be
her body double even though I’m five inches shorter, she’s blonde and
I’ve got dark brown hair.
the DVX100 had a head-clog. Should the DVX100 be used only with
Panasonic tapes? We ended up getting what we needed but even with a
no-stress miniDV shoot, things go wrong.
schedule the mix but we have to do it on nights and weekends since it’s
a freebie.
were a lot of nervous filmmakers there. About an hour after he dropped
off the tape he got a call from a well-known production company. Some
executives want to see his movie and talk to him about a part in an
upcoming production.
Did you enjoy this article? Sign up to receive the StudioDaily Fix eletter containing the latest stories, including news, videos, interviews, reviews and more.
Leave a Reply